Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1956 (9) TMI 47

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....te in a Sales Tax Act case. The respondent in this case is the same as the respondent in Crl. R.C. No. 711 of 1955.* This case relates to the assessment for three months in the year 1952-53. The respondent has not submitted any return declaring his turnover because according to him he had stopped the business as (1) [1956] 7 S.T.C. 346; A.I.R. 1956 Mad. 480.   Since reported as The Public ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ozhikode, and that he will produce them very soon. This statement was made on 16th March, 1954. The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer by notice dated 20th March, 1954, Exhibit P-2, called upon him to pay the tax by assessing the assessee to the best of his judgment. For the quarter he assessed him on the turnover of Rs. 50,000 on the basis of the turnover of Rs. 2,00,000 determined for the previous ye....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t to the best of the judgment cannot therefore stand under the circumstances. This lower court acquitted the respondent on the ground that there was no basis for the assessment on Rs. 50,000 as turnover. It is not correct in holding that there is no basis. But in that case I have pointed out that the previous assessment was not a valid one and the assessment on the basis of the previous invalidate....