Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (6) TMI 781

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ant. Shri P.K. Agarwal, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - These applications are towards waiver of pre-deposit of duty of Rs. 1,70,572/- along with interest and equivalent amount of penalty. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the applicants are engaged in manufacture of excisable goods namely electrical fans and parts and accessories etc. 3. During the course of argumen....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....versed. 4. As per provisions of Rule 4(5)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, the Cenvat Credit shall be allowed even if any inputs or capital goods as such or after being partially processed are sent to a job worker for further processing, testing, repair, reconditioning (or for the manufacture of intermediate goods necessary for the manufacture of final products) or any other purpose, a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r for the inputs said to be used in excess, the assessee has eventually recovered the cost of the material as not used in the job work activity, hence to be considered as not received back at the end of job worker and was required to be reversed. 6. On perusal of the show cause notice it reveals that the allegations against the applicants is (a) inputs lost on account of excessive consumpt....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....m the job workers as penal charges. He further relied on Galaxy Surfactants Ltd. v. CCE, Mumbai-III - 2006 (194) E.L.T. 39 (Tri. - Mum.) wherein it was held that instead of getting 95% yield the appellants may receive goods to the tune of 94.5% or so. It is the accumulated shortages which are ultimately taken note of by the appellants and as a part of the contract between the appellant and job wor....