Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (4) TMI 721

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent. [Order]. - This appeal involves a very short issue. The Commissioner (Appeals) has held that when goods are confiscated and allowed to be redeemed on payment of fine in lieu of confiscation under Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962, in addition to redemption fine, duty is also to be discharged as per the provision of Section 125(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. 2. The appeal was li....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of seizure of 8,786 Kgs of imported polyester yarn without payment of duty. Goods have been confiscated and the duty demand under Section 28 was set aside. On an appeal Commissioner has held that even though duty demand under Section 28 was set aside, the provisions of Section 125(2) is applicable to the case and appellants are liable to pay duty and clear the goods. Appellants have contended tha....