Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2009 (5) TMI 641

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Respondent. [Order]. -  After hearing both sides and on perusal of the records, it is seen that on 8-1-2004 Central Excise Officers visited the respondent's factory and conducted stock verification. The said officers detected shortage of finished goods involving Central Excise duty of Rs. 79,760/-. Shri Om Prakash Yadav, authorized signatory accepted the shortage and deposited the duty on....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in the Show Cause Notice penalty was proposed under Section 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. He further submits that there is no material available to prove clandestine removal of goods. She relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of CCE, Ludhiana v. Omkar Steel Tubes (P) Ltd., reported in 2008 (221) ....