Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2009 (5) TMI 641

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Respondent. [Order]. -  After hearing both sides and on perusal of the records, it is seen that on 8-1-2004 Central Excise Officers visited the respondent's factory and conducted stock verification. The said officers detected shortage of finished goods involving Central Excise duty of Rs. 79,760/-. Shri Om Prakash Yadav, authorized signatory accepted the shortage and deposited the duty on....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....in the Show Cause Notice penalty was proposed under Section 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. He further submits that there is no material available to prove clandestine removal of goods. She relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of CCE, Ludhiana v. Omkar Steel Tubes (P) Ltd., reported in 2008 (221) ....