Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2009 (2) TMI 540

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. -  Being aggrieved with the order passed by Commissioner (Appeals). Revenue has filed the present appeal. We have heard both the sides. 2. The short issue in the present appeal is as to whether Commissioner can review his earlier order directing the assessee to pay duty in terms of compounded levy scheme and can s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ected the appellant to pay duty under the provisions of Rule 96ZQ of Central Excise Rules, 1944. This order has not been reviewed by any competent authority for the relevant period and so remained applicable during the relevant period. The appellant in pursuance of this direction paid compounded duty in spite of there having different view from the very beginning. Subsequently vide Joint Commissio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....entral Excise Act, 1944 as provided the procedure to be followed in the case where the order passed by the Commissioner is required to be changed. Thus the second orders passed by the Commissioner as communicated to the appellant by Joint Commissioner vide his letter dated 27-3-2000 appears to be nullity in law. At most the order could have been applicable prospectively as has also been decided by....