2008 (7) TMI 822

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vocates, for the Appellant. Shri C.S. Rajput, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.K. Das, Member (J)]. -  The relevant facts of the case as on record, in brief, are that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of Motor Vehicles classifiable under Chapter 87 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The appellant removed inputs/partially processed goods to job wor....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....'s premises under Rule 57F of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944. He relied upon the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Preetam Enterprises v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-II reported in 2004 (173) E.L.T. 26 (Tribunal-Mumbai). He submits that in view of the decision of the Tribunal, the demand of duty on the appellant-manufacturer is not sustainable. He fairly submits that the a....