Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (4) TMI 647

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., Consultant, for the Appellant. Shri S.G. Dewalwar, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : M.V. Ravindran, Member (J)]. - These two stay applications are directed against the impugned Order-in-Appeal, which upheld the findings of the adjudicating authority, who confirmed the less charge demand and also imposed penalty on the applicants. Since issue in both the matters being identical, the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d independent in its functioning. It is to be noted that test reports of the DYCC can be contested by the appellant, if he finds it erroneous. To our mind, the lower authorities should have granted the permission for re-testing of the remnant samples. In absence of report on retest, the matter cannot be finalized. We also find strong force in the contention raised by the learned Counsel that the C....