Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (4) TMI 606

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent rectification of mistake application stands filed by the applicant in respect of the Order No. M/177/C-III/WZB/06/SMC dated 28-6-2006 passed by the Tribunal on a miscellaneous application filed by the applicants under Rule 40 & 41 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982, for implementation of the Tribunal's order. While disposing of the appellant's application for implementation of the order, the Tr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... case, which the Tribunal felt, while passing the orders earlier, that the correctness of the Assistant Commissioner's order cannot be adjudged in application for implementation proceedings, it is noticed that the said application stands filed under the provisions of sub Section 2 of the Section 129B of the Customs Act 1962. The said section is to the effect that any mistake apparent from the reco....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....or implementation of its earlier order passed in terms of the Rule 40 & 41 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982, it becomes clear that the provisions of Section 129B (2) are not applicable. The ld. Advocate has not been able to show me any other sources of jurisdiction of the Tribunal to rectify the mistakes in the miscellaneous orders. In any case, I find that this is not a case for exercising inher....