Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (1) TMI 793

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Appellant. Shri Sameer Chitkara, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : M. Veeraiyan, Member (T)]. -  Heard both sides on the stay petition. 2.1 The applicant sold their "business of manufacture and selling of Allethrin" to M/s. Sumitomo Chemicals India Pvt. Ltd, by an agreement dt. 29-7-2005. As a result of such sale, the assets of Allethrin business comprising of building, p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d credit of Rs. 2,10,76,238/- attributable to the inputs and credit of Rs. 1,11,02,496/- attributable to the capital goods. In addition, he also imposed a penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs on the appellant. He also ordered for recovery of interest. 3.1 Ld. Advocate submits that inasmuch as the capital goods, raw materials were not physically removed from the factory and that the appellant continued t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....   M/s. Jamna Auto Inds. Ltd. v. CCE [2001 (130) E.L.T. 181)] 7.      M/s. Mutual Mecaplast Ltd. v. CCE [2007 (220) E.L.T. 888 (T) = 2007 (83) RLT 651 (T)] 8.      M/s. Mutual Mecaplast Ltd. v. CCE [2007 (83) RLT 549 (T)J 4. Ld. SDR reiterates the findings of the Commissioner. 5. We have carefully conside....