Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (5) TMI 545

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....emsp;Appeal No. E/523/03 by M/s. Geeta Prints Ltd. and the Departmental Appeal No. E/677/03 are against the same order of Commissioner (Appeals). 1.3 Appeal No. E/586/03 by M/s. Bindal Silk Mills and the Departmental appeal No. E/673/03 are against the same order of Commissioner (Appeals). 1.4 Appeal No. E/560/03 by M/s. Ashoka Dyg. & Ptg. Mill, Appeal No. E/616/03 by M/s. Balaji Processors and Appeal No. E/1016/03 by M/s. Sona Industries, are parties' appeals against the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals). 1.5 Appeal Nos. E/670/03, E/672/03, E/674/03, E/675/03, E/676/03 are appeals filed by the Department against the order of Commissioner (Appeals). 2. In all these appeals, issue involved is common and therefore t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....87,097/- and the Commissioner (Appeals) reduced the same to Rs. 77,400/-. (d)    In the case of M/s. Geetha Prints Ltd., the original authority imposed a penalty of Rs. 5,25,000/- for delayed payment relating to June, 2000, which was reduced to Rs. 2,63,000/-. (e)     In the case of M/s. Balaji Processors Pvt. Ltd., there was a delay of 5 days for payment of duty for the month of Sep., 2000 and the original authority imposed a penalty of Rs. 3,00,000/- which was reduced to Rs. 60,000/- by Commissioner (Appeals). (f)      In the case of M/s. Zenith Processing Mills, the original authority imposed a penalty of Rs. 2,07,000/- for the months of Jan. to June, 1999, which was reduced ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... M/s Sona. Industries, it is noticed that the delay in payment is not attributable to the assessee. It was admitted that 30th September was an account closing day for the bank and there was no transaction on that day and subsequent days 1st and 2nd October were holidays, the assessee has paid duty due on 3-10-2000. In similar situation, we held the payment has been made on due date and hence the appeal of this assessee is to be allowed. 6.2 In respect of cases in other appeals, delay in payment of duty due is admitted. But it is noticed that there was no intention in these cases to evade any duty and the delay was basically due to financial constraints faced by the assessees. Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat, has held in case of M/s. Par....