Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2007 (11) TMI 526

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent. [Order]. -  The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of MM Fabrics falling under Chapter Headings 64 and 65 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Their factory was visited by Central Excise officers on 19-10-2000, who conducted various checks and verifications. As a result, certain incriminating records showing illicit removal of processed MM fabric was found and seized by the offic....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al amount on the said appellant under Section 11AC of Central Excise Act. In addition, personal penalties of Rs. 1 lakh stands imposed on Shri P.P. Tyagi, Managing Director, Rs. 25,000/- on Shri H.M. Patel, Excise Clerk, in terms of provisions of Rule 209A of Central Excise Rules. Appeals against the above order did not succeed before the Commissioner (Appeals). Hence, the present appeals. 3.&ems....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at all the decisions of the Tribunal stands considered by the Tribunal in the case of Jetex Caburettors Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, Vadodara reported in 2007 (210) E.L.T. 73 (Tri.-Ahmd.) = 2007 (5) S.T.R. 446 (Tribunal). For better appreciation, I reproduce the Para 5 of the said order. "5. In any case, I find that the entire case of the Revenue is based upon the scrutiny of the documents conducted on....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....T. 297 (Tri.-Del.) - Demand - Limitation - Delay in issue of SCN - SCN issued after two years of completion of investigation - Delay not properly explained by Revenue - Demand time barred. (iii)    Lovely Food Industries v. CCE, Cochin - 2006 (195) E.L.T. 90 (Tri.-Bang.) - Demand - Limitation - SCN issued after a lapse of 3 years - Department gathered all information on their visi....