Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (4) TMI 597

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt. Shri M.M. Mathkar, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : B.S.V. Murthy, Member (T)]. -  The appellants brought back the duty paid pesticides to their factory for the purpose of repacking and carrying out other processes under Rule 173H of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. There is no dispute that the appellants relabeled where there was damage in label and in case where there was l....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....processing, by doing the processes such as, dyeing, stantering, heat setting etc., the benefit of Rule 173H cannot be denied since these processes are carried out again on the fabrics. They state that in their case also, they had repeated the processes which are deemed to be manufacture and therefore, the benefit cannot be denied. They also cited the judgment of the Tribunal in the case of Ammonia....