Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2006 (7) TMI 567

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. -  The prayer in the application is for dispensation with the condition of pre-deposit of duty of Rs. 87,97,302/- confirmed against the appellants/applicants as anti-dumping duty and of Rs. 5,91,439/- confirmed as SAD. In addition, personal penalty of identical amount has been imposed under the provisions of Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tandardisation Testing & Quality Certification Directorate, Government of India, Salt Lake City, Kolkata. On such test, PL Lamps were found to be compact fluorescent lamps attracting anti-dumping duty in terms of Notification No. 138/2002-Cus., dated 10-12-02, vide which the earlier provisional notification was made final with retrospective effect. 4. Based upon the above result, the proceed....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... sides, we prima-facie do not find favour with the appellants' pleas. The present proceedings relate to mis-declaration of the description  of the goods. Whereas the appellants described the goods as P.L. lamps, the same, on test, was found to be fluorescent lamps without choke. Inasmuch  as the goods were imported from China, they were leviable to anti-dumping duty. The misdeclaration o....