Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (2) TMI 686

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t. Shri P.K. Kathiyar, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - The appellants had claimed Modvat credit of Rs. 9,97,586/- on capital goods and they had also claimed depreciation of the amount under the Income-tax Act during the years 1999-2000 and 2000-2001. This was in contravention of Rule 57(8) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, and, therefore, show cause notice proposing recovery of the c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oint Commissioner once again confirmed the demand and penalty on the ground that the appellants could not produce the assessed income-tax returns as directed by the Tribunal; his order was upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals); hence this appeal. 3. I have heard both sides. Although detailed submissions were made on the provisions of Section 143 of the Income-tax Act, to support the content....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nrise Structurals & Engineering Ltd. & Ors. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur, Order Nos. A/711 to 722/WZB/2004/C-II, dated 27-8-2004 which has been followed in the case of Milton Polyplast v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Thane-II, Order Nos. A/633-635/WZB/2005/C-III, dated 27-5-2005 [2006 (201) E.L.T. 372 (Tri.)]. Both these decisions have been followed in M/s. Polyset Plastics Ltd. v.....