Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2008 (2) TMI 684

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Respondent. Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)].  We have heard Shri J.C. Patel, learned advocate appearing for the appellant and Shri M.M. Mathkar, learned JDR appearing for the Revenue. 2. As per the facts on record, the appellant is a unit located in Kandla Special Economic Zone. They cleared 100% Polyester Fabrics and Polyvinyl Alcohol Gohsenol to another 100% EOU ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... main contention is that the goods having been cleared against the proper CT-3 certificate and re-warehousing certificate having been received by them from 100% EOU, the duty liability cannot be fastened upon them. In case such re-warehousing certificate having been found to be forged by 100% EOU, the duty demand should be raised against such 100% EOU. For the above proposition, they have also inv....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....forged re-warehousing certificate. On the contrary, the investigations revealed that the consignee, a 100% EOU, was indulging in preparation of forged and fake re-warehousing certificate, in which case, the appellant cannot be doubted or penalized for placing the same before the authority. The Board's circular would definitely be applicable in as much as the same refers to non-receipt of re-wareho....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... same are proved not to have been used in connection with the production of the goods for export purposes. Similarly, in case of CCE, Cochin v. BPL Systems & Projects Ltd. - 2002 (144) E.L.T. 437 (Tribunal), it has been held that in case the goods are removed by a manufacturer on receipt of CT-3 certificate to a 100% EOU, and not used as envisaged, action for recovery of the duty liability on exem....