Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2008 (1) TMI 735

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tariff area (DTA) without payment of duty during the period December, 1994 to July, 1995. They issued a show-cause notice dated 2-3-99 demanding duty of over Rs. 9.9 lakhs from the assessee and proposing penalties under various provisions of Central Excise Rules, 1944. Interest on duty was also demanded under Section 11AB and penalty was also proposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act. The demands and proposals were contested. In adjudication, the original authority confirmed the above demand of duty against the assessee by invoking the extended period of limitation and imposed on them a penalty of Rs. 1 lakh. In the assessee's appeal against the decision of the original authority, ld. Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the demand ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o Section 12 of the Customs Act in the context of quantification of Central Excise duty, duty of excise was leviable on the commodity. 3. Ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that, in the case of C.T. Cotton Yarn Ltd. v. CCE Indore, 2006 (202) E.L.T. 385 (S.C.), the Hon'ble Supreme Court remanded the question of excisability of cotton waste to this Tribunal and that, in the remanded proceedings, the Tribunal has held that cotton waste cannot be treated as a manufactured product vide Final Order Nos. 384-385/07, dated 27-6-07 in Excise Appeal Nos. 1715 & 1716/97, of the Principal Bench, New Delhi [2007 (218) E.L.T. 233 (T)]. 4. Ld. SDR has reiterated the grounds of the Revenue's appeal and also has opposed the assessee's appeal. ....