Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2007 (12) TMI 324

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....poles falling under Tariff Item 6810 99 90 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. On scrutiny of the ER-1 returns for the months April, 2005 to March, 2006, it was observed that the total aggregate value of the clearance for the financial year 2005-06 was Rs. 119.25 lakhs, whereas no duty had been paid on crossing the exemption limit of Rs. 100 lakhs. Therefore, a show cause notice was issued to the appellants for demand of differential duty, for payment of interest thereon and for imposition of penalties. After considering the submissions made by the appellants, the lower authority held that the appellants were liable to pay duty amount of Rs. 3,10,086/- and education cess of Rs. 6,202/-, along with interest. A penal....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ission. 5. I have gone through the grounds of appeal, submissions made at the time of hearing and all other evidence on record. It is not disputed by the appellants that in the absence of notification No. 74/93-C.E., dated 28-2-93, they become liable for payment of duty on crossing the exemption limit of Rs. 100 lakhs and as demanded under the impugned order. Their appeal is solely confined to the eligibility of exemption under notification No. 74/93-C.E., dated 28-2-93. 6. The exemption under notification No. 74/93-C.E., dated 28-2-93 is available provided the goods are manufactured by a factory belonging to a State Government and such goods are intended for use, by any Department of that Government. That PCC Pole factory of th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of the State of Madhya Pradesh in the year 2000. It owes its existence to the creation under sub-section (1) of Section 5 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, read with Section 58 of the Madhya Pradesh Re-organisation Act, 2000. Therefore, CSEB is a creation of Acts of Parliament. On the other hand, the Government or a Department of the Government, derives its source to the Constitution of India. The Supreme Court in the case of UP State Electricity Board (supra) have in no uncertain terms held that the Electricity Board is not 'State' within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India. Thus, it follows that CSEB is distinct from a Department of the State Government. Whether an Electricity Board is a Department of the State Go....