Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (7) TMI 495

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Shri K.J. Sanchis, Jt. CDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - After hearing both the sides duly represented by Shri Willingdon Christian, learned Advocate and Shri K.J. Sanchis, learned DR, we find that duty of Rs. 11,15,901/- stands confirmed against the appellant on the allegation and findings of clandestine manufacture and removal of processed MM fabrics along w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(190) E.L.T. 433 (S.C.). Shri Christian submits that in the absence of Clause I of Rule 173Q having been specified by the adjudicating authority, penalty cannot be sustained against them. He also relies on the Tribunal's decision in the case of Parag Fan & Cooling Systems Ltd. v. C.C.E. - 2006 (76) RLT 319 (CESTAT- Delhi). 2. Countering the arguments, learned DR submits that the ratio of the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....iled orders specifically listing the allegations, the evidences relied upon by the Revenue and the proposal made for imposition of penalty. During adjudication, the appellant admitted the clandestine removal thus inviting penal action in terms of Rule 173Q read with Section 11AC. In such a scenario, the ratio of the Hon'ble Supreme Court judgment will not apply. The absence of sub-clause of sub-ru....