Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (6) TMI 456

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Shri K.K. Varrier, Consultant, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J)]. - Both the Revenue's appeals arise from the Order-in-Appeal Nos. 150 & 151/2004 dated 15-12-2004. The Commissioner (Appeals) after due examination of the matter noted that where the goods are captively consumed and exempted by respective Notifications, they are not required to pay duty. He also ref....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... consumers is on the assessee. She refers to the Apex Court judgment rendered in the case of Union of India v. Solar Pesticide Pvt Ltd. reported in 2000 (116) E.L.T. 401 (S.C.) wherein it has been clarified that the assessee is required to discharge burden of unjust enrichment. 3. The learned Consultant submits that they had discharged the burden by showing the price to be constant. He ref....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ints (I) Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Excise, Mumbai-III [2006 (199) E.L.T. 873 (Tri.-Mumbai)] 4. We have carefully considered the submissions made by both the sides. The assessee has shown that the price of the final products has not been influenced on the intermediate products. They had admitted before the Commissioner (Appeals) that the burden of duty has not been passed on to the consume....