Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (5) TMI 605

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nst action initiated by JDGFT, Cochin, and Deputy Commissioner of Customs  (DEEC), Custom House, Chennai respectively. 2. S/Shri Krishna Kumar and K. Balasubramanian, Advocates, appeared on behalf of the applicant. Shri R. Jagannathan, Jt. Commissioner, Group 7 (DEEC), Custom House, Chennai represented the Revenue. 3. The applicant imported three consignments for a total quantity of 4293.014 MT 'non-alloy re-rollable scrap' during the period from August, 2001 to December, 2001 for manufacture and export of steel products. Due to unfavourable international market conditions and non-availability of export orders, the applicant could not go ahead with their plans to fulfil export obligations in terms of the Advance Licence....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the interest; otherwise, recovery action under the Customs Act, 1962, will be initiated as the applicant "have failed the conditions of Bond executed". 4. The Advocate submitted that in view of the foregoing facts, the applicant is now before the Settlement Commission for settlement of their case especially with regard to waiver of interest. The Advocate also pleaded for immunities against penalty and prosecution. 5. The Revenue was represented by Shri R. Jagannathan, Jt. Commissioner. He said that since the applicant had paid the duty, the Department had no objection for admitting the settlement application. However, he insisted that in terms of the Bond executed by the applicant, and as per contractual obligation, the app....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s of its contents read with the customs letter dated 23-12-2004. The Bench, therefore, having regard to the ratio of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court decision in the case of Mahendra Petrochemicals Ltd. v. Union of India, 2004 (165) E.L.T. 499 (Guj.), proceeds to deal with the applicant's case. There is also a DGFT Policy Circular No. 25/2004-09, dated 30-3-2005, holding that cases involving export obligation defaults will come under the purview of Settlement Commission, for settlement of Customs Duty and interest. Having paid the Customs duty in full, the point at issue relates to waiver of interest on duty, demanded by the Customs authorities. 9. The Bench observes that the impugned goods were imported during the period August to De....