Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (3) TMI 607

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... [Order]. -  The relevant facts of the case in brief are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of sugar and molasses. On 14-11-2003, the Central Excise Officers conducted physical verification of stock of molasses in presence of the appellants and found a quantity of 386.444 MT of molasses excess over and above the reported balance after allowing 10% foaming deduction in the ste....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... decision of the Tribunal as under :- (i)      Kisan Sahkari Chini Mills v. CCE, Ghaziabad, 2001 (129) E.L.T. 364 (ii)    Seksaria Biswan Sugar Factory Limited v. CCE, Lucknow, 2001 (135) E.L.T. 1024 (Tri. - Del.). 3. The learned authorized representative (DR) on behalf of the Revenue submits that the appellants in their statement accepted the excess....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of molasses. The Tribunal in the case of Kisan Sahkari Chini Mills v. CCE, 2001 (129) E.L.T. 364 (Tri. - Del.) allowed 10% allowances for foaming during dip reading measurement. In the said case, the representative of the appellant in their statement stated that due to sufficient quantity of foaming was in the tank and excess quantity of molasses could not be ascertained. In the present case, I d....