Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2007 (2) TMI 546

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pellant. Shri K. Sambi Reddy, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : T.K. Jayaraman, Member (T)]. - This appeal has been filed by the appellants against the Order-in-Appeal No. 174/2004-C.E., dated 18-8-2004, passed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise (Appeals), Cochin. 2. The appellants are manufacturers of tread rubber which is an excisable commodity. Till 31-3-2000, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Rs. 1,22,070/-. The lower authority confirmed the demand by Order-in-Original No. 13/2001 dated 5-2-2001. The appellants appealed to the Commissioner (Appeals). The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the Order-in-Original. The appellants are aggrieved over the impugned Order-in-Appeal. 2. Shri S. Vittal Shetty, learned Advocate appeared for the appellants. He urged the following :- (i)&nbsp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er. (iii)   The following case laws were relied on :- (a)      Guardian Rubber Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, Cochin [2005 (183) E.L.T. 285 (Tri. - Bang.)] (b)      Raghuvar (India) Ltd. v. CCE, Delhi [2002 (140) E.L.T. 280 (Tri. - LB.)] (c)      CCE, Kanpur v. Hi-Tech Polypack [2001 (127) E.L.T. 118 (Tri. - Del.)]....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....efully. This Bench in the case of Guardian Rubber Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of C.Ex., Cochin [2005 (183) E.L.T. 285 (Tri.-Bang.)] has held that while opting out of Modvat Scheme, the appellants are required only to reverse the credit on the inputs lying in stock and also on the inputs contained in the finished goods. Since waste product is not considered as finished goods, it has been held that cr....