Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (2) TMI 394

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Respondent. [Order per : Justice R.K. Abichandani, President]. - We have heard both the sides. 2. It appears from the record that the appellant had claimed the benefit of the goods supplied to the specified institution, as provided by Notification No. 10/97-CE dated 1-3-1997, under which subject to the conditions tabulated therein, the goods specified in column (3) of the Table were exem....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e was withdrawn with immediate effect. Apart from the contention that this communication related to the payment of customs duty, it transpires that the withdrawal of the facility was not expressly made retrospective, nor is there anything in the said communication by which it can be inferred that such withdrawal was impliedly made retrospective. Therefore, the transactions, which took place under ....