2007 (1) TMI 317

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ocate, for the Appellant. Shri R.B. Pardeshi, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Vice-President]. -  In both these appeals, the Revenue holds that the price at which M/s. Novartis India Ltd. sold P & P medicaments to customers should be adopted as the assessable value for valuation of the medicaments in the hands of the assessee herein whom the department holds ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....essee and Novartis is that of loan licence. In Appeal No. E/3338/05, the Commissioner (Appeals) who has passed the impugned order held that the assessee is loan licensee for Novartis. 2. We have heard both sides on both the appeals. 3. We find that in Appeal No. 714/05, the show cause notice only alleged that the assessee was the hired labour of Novartis. Therefore, the duty demand....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y. Commissioner who dropped the proceedings and the challenge by the Revenue before the Commissioner (Appeals) is only on the ground that the assessee is hired labour of Novartis. Therefore, the finding of the Commissioner (Appeals) which is only to the effect that the assessee is working under the loan licence scheme for Novartis is beyond the scope of the show cause notice, cannot be sustained. ....