Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2006 (10) TMI 286

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t. [Order per : T.V. Sairam, Member (T)]. - This appeal has been filed by the Revenue. Apparently, in the stay application, the provision under which such an application has been made, is not indicated. In this application, the Revenue has prayed to stay the operation of the impugned order of Commissioner (Appeals) and to pass such order or orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the interest....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....has made it clear that Acrylic Fibre also includes Acrylic Tow. No problem can stand the assault of sustained thinking. In the penultimate paragraph of the order, the Learned Commissioner (Appeals) has thought over in the following manner, which prima facie, appears reasonable to us at this stage : "The further contention of the appellant that the duty in question was got deposited by the Departm....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... refundable to them as the doctrine of unjust enrichment is not applicable when duty paid subsequent to clearance of goods. This view has been taken by the CESTAT in the case Gujrat State Fertilizer v. CCE - 2005 (186) E.L.T. 607 (Tri.-Mumbai)." 4. We have examined the case records and heard both sides. Rule 41 referred to above relates to the orders of the Tribunal and not to those of autho....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er is before the highest fact finding body of the Nation, awaiting a final hearing in its due course. 5. The asseverations have been made by the learned SDR, that there is a dire need to secure the ends of justice as the Commissioner (Appeals) has passed a decision adverse to the interests of Revenue. At this rate, such an argument would mean that any quasi-judicial order passed by the Commi....