Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2005 (5) TMI 585

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent. [Order]. - The brief facts of the case are that the respondent were sending inputs as such or partially processed goods to job worker under Rule 57F(4) of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944 on job work Challan. While sending the goods they were reversing Cenvat credit amount @ 10% of the value of such input and on return of said goods they were re-taking the credit which was reversed....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., 2000. 2. The revenue in its appeal stated that the Modvat credit was taken on the basis of Annexure-II challan which were not specified document for availment of the credit and therefore the respondent have suppressed the facts and extended period was invocable. 3. I have considered the submission. I find that as observed by the Commissioner (Appeals) the appellant were submitting th....