Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (2) TMI 364

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to dispose of them by this consolidated order for the sake of convenience. A.Y. 1997-98, Assessee's appeal : 2. All the grounds of assessee's appeal deal with only one issue viz., the treatment of Rs. 50,21,969 as capital expenditure and not revenue as claimed by the assessee. 3. Briefly stated the facts of these grounds are that the assessee is engaged in the business of development of packaged Computer Software designed to meet specific needs of the clients. The same business was carried on in earlier years as well. During the year the assessee claimed the following items as revenue expenditure. Software Development Expenditure Rs. 3,53,148 Technology Creation Expenditure Rs. 10,06,166 Purchase of Data Bases Rs. 36,62,655 Rs. 50....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dules was created till 1995. The expenses on setting up of the software were treated as capital in nature. It was further explained that with a view to provide better software the assessee-company introduced a "CD Jurix". This system of head notes and catch notes in the software was introduced and for the purpose an agreement was entered into with Current Tax Reporter (CTR) in December 1995 and others. It was further explained by the ld. A.R. that initially the PC software was subscribed for Rs. 20,000 and each module on different subject was subscribed from Rs. 45,000 to Rs. 25,000. However, in the financial year 1995-96 "CD Jurix" was introduced with an initial price of Rs. 25,000 on each data base which was reduced to Rs. 15,000 for fres....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tion to the updation of the initially developed CD in February 1996. The first expenditure is software development expenses at Rs. 3,53,148 the details of which is available at page 81 of the paper book. It comprises of seminar expenses at Rs. 3,53,148, foreign travelling expenses at Rs. 2,76,897 and professional fees at Rs. 68,750, totalling Rs. 6,98,795. 50 per cent of this expenditure was claimed in the books as revenue, which fact has not been disputed by the Assessing Officer. It is only the impugning 50 per cent which in the books of account was claimed as capital but in the computation of income as revenue that the Assessing Officer has disputed it to be not deductible. On the perusal of details of such expenses provided at pages 81 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ire amount for the updation of its product, which initially came into existence in the preceding year. Now the question arises as to whether the expenditure of updation is to be deemed as revenue or capital in nature. The ld. D.R. has strongly contended that since the expenditure incurred by the assessee results into enduring benefit, spreading over a number of years, hence it should be taken as capital expenditure. We find that it is not every expenditure of enduring nature which can be taken as capital expenditure. The thin line, which divides the capital and revenue expenditure is the expansion in the capital base resulting from the expenditure of enduring nature incurred by the assessee. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Empire J....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... to date. Under no circumstances this expenditure can be branded as capital in nature. This case can be viewed from an other angle. The re-printing of a book simultaneous with the updation of an edition leads to incurring of the input cost such as re-printing charges, payment to author for updation and proof reading etc. When the revised edition is sold in the market and the sale proceeds are taken as trading receipts, the expenditure incurred towards input costs, as discussed above, is to be allowed as deduction against such sale proceeds. On the same analogy the input cost on the updation of the existing CD on quarterly basis cannot be treated as capital expenditure for the reason that the original CD when brought out was creation of an a....