Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2006 (2) TMI 524

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... [Order]. -  Heard both sides and perused the record. Both Revenue and assessee are in appeal. 2. Revenue's appeal No. E/1707/04 is directed against claim of Modvat credit on refractory used by the assessee. It is being pointed out that in terms of Rule 57Q as it stood during the relevant period (prior to 23-7-96) only "refractory falling within Chapter 69" was specified item for the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ified under Chapter 38. However, the Division Bench held that "spares" covered by Clause (a) to Explanation (1) to Rule 57Q covered the item and credit was made available. In Associated Cement Company Ltd. case, the dispute was about fire crete and whythreat and the Tribunal held that these refractory materials were eligible. Thus, the issue remains covered in favour of the assessee by the decisio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s contained all particulars of the present unit as customer. Inadvertent mentioning of one more unit's name, that too the appellant itself, is no ground for denying credit. The appellant has relied on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of C.C.E., Jaipur v. Snow Cem India Ltd. - 1997 (96) E.L.T. 627 in support of the contention that in the case of a multi factory company, the entry of wrong u....