Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (11) TMI 416

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... SDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. -  M/s. Tamil Nadu Newsprint and Papers Ltd., (TNNPL, for short) had cleared certain quantity of paper to their customer on payment of duty during 1999-2000, though they were not liable to pay the duty. Subsequently, they filed a refund claim in respect of the duty amount (Rs. 67,954/-). The original authority sanctioned the refund after noting that th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... adjusting the refund amount against an earlier demand of duty confirmed against the assessee, M/s. TNNPL preferred an appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals). The appellate authority by Order-in-Appeal No. 336/2003, dated 18-11-2003 dismissed that appeal in view of Order-in-Appeal No. 331/2003 ibid. The present appeal is against Order-in-Appeal No. 336/2003. After hearing both sides and considering ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ier demand of duty confirmed against the party. The present appeal is only against Order-in-Appeal No. 336/2003 and cannot be considered to be one filed against Order-in-Appeal No. 331/2003. 3. Relying on Board's Circular No. 423/56/98-CX, dated 22-9-1998, ld Counsel argued that, if the refund order passed by the original authority was erroneous, the only option for the Department was to i....