Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2005 (10) TMI 455

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ri, Jt. CDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Vice-President]. - The appellants herein, who are engaged in the manufacture of bulk drugs and pharmaceutical products falling under Chapters 29 and 30 of the Schedule to the CETA 1985, manufactured the following 4 items and cleared them by claiming concessional rate of duty in terms of Notification No. 31/88-C.E., dated 1-3-88 a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....onfiscation of land, plant, building etc. used in the manufacture and clearance of the goods. The period covered in the notice was 2-10-92 to 29-6-95, and the proviso to Sec. 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act was invoked. The notice was adjudicated by the Addl. Commissioner who dropped the demand raised on item at sr. no. (1). However, in respect of the remaining 3 items he rejected the claim that ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....emand. The appellants had been filing classification lists and classification declarations throughout the period in dispute, describing the products correctly and claiming them to be bulk drugs entitled to concessional rate of duty under Notification No. 31/88. We have perused the classification lists and find that all the 3 products in dispute were described as of technical grade. The classificat....