Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2006 (2) TMI 438

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ghvan, Advocates, for the Appellant. Shri S.N. Prasad, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : C.N.B. Nair, Member (T)]. -  The appellant is a manufacturer of Video Magnetic Tapes (VMT) and Blank Video Cassettes (BVC). These goods are liable to central excise duty on ad valorem basis. When they cleared the consignment they discharged duty based on the sale price. The period of dispute i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is placed on the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of C.C.E., New Delhi v. Guru Nanak Refrigeration Corpn. - 2003 (153) E.L.T. 249 (S.C.). 3. We have perused the records and heard the learned SDR also. 4. Clearly, the finding is a misdirection. The basis for valuation of excisable goods is the normal price at which the goods are sold. Only if such a sale price is no....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ld at the normal price within the meaning of Section 4(1)(a) of the Act. In our view, the Tribunal is right in accepting the wholesale price as the correct price following the judgment of the Court in Union of India & Ors. v. Bombay Tyres International Ltd. etc. [1983 (14) E.L.T. 1896], We hold that clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Act would not be attracted to determine the neare....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... The only reason for this is that, until the goods became liable to duty on ad valorem basis (1-3-94), the appellant was not keeping separate entries, grade-wise, in statutory excise records (RG-1). It is, therefore, held that subsequent grading is only to evade duty. The submission of  the learned counsel is that the goods were being graded even when they were liable to duty at specific rat....