Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2005 (1) TMI 585

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., Consultant, for the Appellant. Shri Vimlesh Kumar, for the Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Vice-President]. - The above appeals involve common issue and can be heard together and disposed of by this common order. The issue in these appeals is as to whether pattern development charges and die development charges recovered by the appellants herein who are manufacturers of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t judgment in Universal Cables Ltd., Satna v. Union of India and Others - 1977 (1) E.L.T. (J 92) in support of the contention that the method of valuation of excisable goods is laid down in Section 4 of the Act and the Board cannot prescribe different methods of valuation by issuing supplementary instructions, we note that the High Court judgment was delivered in September, 1976 which is much prio....