2006 (1) TMI 382

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Shri K.S. Bhatt, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J) (Oral)]. -  For the purpose of hearing, the appellant is required to pre-deposit Rs. 16,15,98,728/-. They had been supplying raw materials to their job workers for manufacture of garments after availing Cenvat credit. The job workers has manufactured the garments on job work charges and has returned the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the balance they have a very strong case on merits. The learned Counsel also submits that the appellants are facing severe financial hardship. He produced the balance sheet to show that there is a loss of Rs. 13 crores. He further relies on the judgment of this Bench rendered in the case of Rado Types Ltd. v. CCE reported in 2004 (174) E.L.T. 218 wherein a similar circumstance, the transfer of go....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... supplied to the job workers. He submits that the definition would not change in an instance of "sale" or "purchase" and it remains the same and what is applicable for Modvat credit would also be the goods in question. He submits that full wavier be granted otherwise they would be put to severe financial hardship in the matter. 3. The learned SDR submits that the Revenue has got a very goo....