Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2006 (2) TMI 316

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Respondent : Shri Ganesh Havanur, SDR Order T.K. Jayaraman, Member (T) 1. This is an appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. 30/2005 Central Excise dated 31st March 2005 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Bangalore. 2. On finalisation of provisional assessment for the period from 1995 to 1999, refund of Rs. 30,71,465/- was sanctioned by the Assistant Commissi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s). The Commissioner (Appeals) observed that the letter is not a speaking order, discussing the subject and therefore, he would not be going into the merits of the contention made by the appellant in their grounds of appeal. With the above observation, he dismissed the appeal of the appellant. Aggrieved over the impugned order, the appellants have come before this Tribunal for relief. 3. Shri G....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....efore, the refund of Rs 30,71,465/- granted to appellants has attained finality. The appellants were repeatedly approaching the Assistant Commissioner for grant of the refund. However, while granting the refund a part of the amount was ordered to be credited to RG 23A Part-II Account. The authorities have not heeded to the request of the appellant that the amount should be paid in cash/cheque as t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ills - 1994 (73) E.L.T. 648. (6) DCM Data Products v. CCE, New Delhi - 1994 (71) E.L.T. 631. (7) CCE, Rajkot v. Deepak Vegetable Oil Industries Ltd. - 2001 (127) E.L.T. 817. (8) Ashok Arc v. CCE, Jamshedpur - 2002 (145) E.L.T. 591. (9) Eicher Tractors v. CCE, Hyderabad - 2002 (147) E.L.T. 457. (10) Universal Cables Ltd. v. CCE, Bhopal - 2003 (159) E.L.T....