Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2006 (1) TMI 317

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....swanathan, Advocates, for the Appellant. Shri Ajay Saxena, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Sekhon, Member (T)]. - Heard both sides in these applications. By the impugned order, the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) has rejected the appeals filed before him and confirmed anti-dumping duty of Rs. 30,23,361/-. Pursuant to a Notification 143/03-Cus. levying anti-dumping duty....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as also been constantly holding that anti-dumping duty are not leviable when imports were made after expiry of a notification by which levy was brought which was noted by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) in his stay order dated 29-7-2005. On an identical issue, by this Tribunal's Bangalore Bench on 28-7-2005 in the case of CCE v. Raghav Enterprises and Orient Impex [2005 (189) E.L.T. 4....