Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2003 (6) TMI 433

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed against the order of the CIT(A)-XXXI, Mumbai, pertaining to the assessment year 1994-95. 2. The only grievance of the Revenue is that the CIT(A) erred in holding that the amount credited in the capital account of retired partner upon revaluation of assets of the firm is not taxable as capital gain. 3. The assessee is an individual. During the previous year relevant to the assessment year 1994....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... arising on revaluation of assets of the partnership firm as on 13-9-1993 is for assessing or relinquishing his interest on share in favour of the continuing partners and this transaction tantamount to transfer within the meaning of section 2(47) of the Act and the gains arising therefrom is taxable as capital gains. Accordingly, he brought to tax, the amount of Rs. 12,50,000 as short-term capital....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d. [1972] 83 ITR 211 , the Apex Court held that mere revaluation of assets do not give rise to any taxable profits or gains. It was also pointed out that before the Assessing Officer reliance was also placed on the decisions of Allahabad High Court reported at Addl. CIT v. Smt. Mohinderpal Bhasin [1979] 117 ITR 26 , CIT v. Madan Lal Bhargava [1980] 122 ITR 545, Andhra Pradesh High Court decision i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....their Lordships held that any sum received by the assessee as his share of value of goodwill is not assessable as capital gains, following the decision in CIT v. B.C. Srinivas Setty [1981] 128 ITR 294 (SC) and that even where a partner retires and some amount is paid to him towards his share in the assets, it should be treated as falling under clause (ii) of section 47 and accordingly, cannot be a....