Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2005 (10) TMI 361

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pellant. None, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Sekhon, Member (T)]. - Revenue is in appeal, aggrieved by the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) upholding the confirmation of the amount of duty by lower authorities but setting aside the imposition of penalty of Rs. 35,000/- on the assessee. 2. The grounds, taken up by Revenue, are that the Apex Court in the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....im, since he is a quasi judicial officer. (b)     Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), as it appears from the order impugned, as regards penalty held that the appellant had removed the goods, after following the proper Central Excise procedure and on payment of duty and there was no mala fide to evade payment of duty. Hence penalty imposed under Rule 173Q of the Central....