2005 (8) TMI 473

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Respondent. [Order per : T.K. Jayaraman, Member (T)]. -  Revenue has filed an appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. 75/86, dated 26-6-1998 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Trichy. 2. The brief facts of the case are as follows : The appellants manufactured fireworks, an excisable commodity. They were availing the SSI exemption under Notification No. 1/93 and also the M....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Superintendent of Central Excise, while making assessment on the RT 12s should have adjusted the amount paid in excess against the duty short paid vide invoice No. 353 to 359. In such cases the Superintendent of Central Excise is competent to demand duty or to giant refund under the provisions of Rule 171-I. Therefore, the observations of the lower authority that they should have filed refund c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ty." 2. The Revenue has come in appeal against the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) on tlie following grounds : (i)      When there is an excess payment of duty by applying higher rate than the one approved in tlie CL then the refund would be covered by Section 11B as it is not a case of mere assessment of RT 12 returns in terms of Rule 173B. Tlie assessee s....