2005 (5) TMI 532
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - None appeared for the appellants. Heard Shri N.K. Mishra, ld. JDR for the Revenue. Shri Mishra points out that the Defect Memo has been issued to them which is as follows : "1. Column No. 5 & 7 of EA-3 are remained blank and to be filled up. 2. Column No. 8 needs rectification. 3.&n....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ved and the duty and penalty have not been deposited, Shri Mishra submits that the appeal may be dismissed for non-compliance under Rule 11(2) of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. 2. After hearing Shri Mishra, I find that more than eight months have already been passed, the appellants have neither removed the defects pointed out in defects memo nor they have paid the duty and penalty. In ....
TaxTMI