Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2005 (2) TMI 739

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Appellant. Smt. N.L. Butalia, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Vice-President]. -  Heard both sides. 2. Appellants filed this appeal against the Order-in-Appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) whereby the refund claim filed by the appellants was rejected on the ground of unjust enrichment. 3. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants filed refun....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....oices where duty element has been separately mentioned and there was no evidence that that duty element mentioned in the invoices was not recovered by the appellants from their customers and in some cases, consolidated price was mentioned. Revenue has also relied upon the decision in the case of CCE, Mumbai-II v. Allied Photographics India Ltd. - 2004 (166) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.). 5. We find that i....