Home /
2004 (10) TMI 533
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Kang, Vice-President]. - Heard both sides.  2.Revenue filed this appeal against the order in appeal. In the present case the contention of the Revenue is that appellant was availing the benefit of exemption Notification No. 6/2000 after crossing the limit mentioned in the notification that they were clearing the goods on the same price on which the ....