2005 (4) TMI 428

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri S.V. Parelkar, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Vice-President].-  The demand of Rs. 83,02,115/- has been confirmed against the appellants herein on the ground that the appellants incurred less amount towards freight charges than a lump sum deduction of freight charges from the assessable value claimed by them. In addition t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uction, the deduction has to be accepted as claim for deduction of equalization freight. Moreover in the cases of Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur v. A. Infrastructure Limited - 2000 (122) E.L.T. 170 (Tribunal) and Farm Fresh Foods (P) Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Chandigarh - 1999 (113) E.L.T. 441 (Tribunal), the Tribunal has held that excess amount claimed as freight cannot be incl....