Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (2) TMI 663

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Appellant. Shri A.K. Saxena, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : T. Anjaneyulu, Member (J)]. -  The Asst. Commissioner, Central Excise, Belapur, found that the Range Supdt. has issued Show Cause Notice to the assessee on the ground that he has availed Modvat credit by filing declaration, which does not run parallel to the procedure laid down in the Rule 57G, which they mean to s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t under the Rules. Therefore, he has allowed credit of Rs. 1,93,867/- as demanded as per Show Cause Notice dated 13-4-1997 and duty amounting to Rs. 27,419/- under Rule 57(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. Hence the assessee is in appeal. 2. The appellants relied upon the decision reported in the case of GAIL, (India) Ltd. v. CCE, Kanpur, [2005 (66) RLT 352 (CESTAT-Del.]. It is observe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... before receipt of the capital goods. In view of these facts, the Modvat credit in respect of these capital goods cannot be denied to the appellants merely because the declaration was filed late in view of the Board's Circular dated 23-2-99. We, therefore, set aside the impugned order as far as it relates to disallowance of Modvat credit amounting to Rs. 3,91,71,898/- and hold that the appellants ....