Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2005 (1) TMI 555

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....va, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Moheb Ali M., Member (T)]. -  The appellant is a 100% EOU licensed to manufacture Polyester Texturised Yarn. The allegation is that the appellant grossly undervalued Polyester Texturised Yarn while clearing it DTA in order to evade duty on such clearances. The value declared in the invoices for goods cleared to DTA ranged from Rs. 45/- to Rs. 30/- p....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ully aware of the prices at which goods were sold in DTA and to other EOUs. 5. After hearing both sides and perusing the records we observe that the Department made out a case of undervaluation only on the basis of invoices and CT-3 filed by the appellant during the relevant period. The documents relied upon by the Department clearly establishes this facts. It is not a case where assessee ha....