Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2004 (10) TMI 525

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ant. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J) (Oral)]. - For the purpose of hearing the appeals, the appellants are required to pre-deposit duty amount of Rs. 28,59,193/- and like sum of penalty besides penalty of Rs. 5,00,000/- on Shri S. Vijaya Kumar, General Manager of the Company. The charge against the appellants is that they have not utilized the inputs Oxygen and Nitrogen gases directly or i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e . Therefore it was the contention that the process of lancing and cutting the solidified metal was the process of manufacture and hence the view taken by the Department was not correct. The ld. Counsel relied on the several judgments. He states that the process of the recovered inputs from the furnace was a process of manufacture as recovered inputs were again used for manufacture of final produ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the submissions made by both the sides, we find force in the submissions made by the ld. Counsel. At this prima facie stage, we find that the Larger Bench judgment referred to by the ld. SDR is distinguishable with the facts of this case. The activity undertaken by the appellants is not maintenance and repair of plant but the furnace was; got stuck with the inputs and the same got solidified an....