Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2005 (2) TMI 633

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Ramakrishnappa, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : T.K. Jayaraman, Member (T)]. - These appeals have been filed by M/s. The Andhra Pradesh Paper Mills Ltd., Rajahmundry, against OIAs 135-139/2001, dated 11-12-2001 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Hyderabad. The brief facts of the case are as follows : 2. The appellants cleared goods on payment of duty to their s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....at they have not followed the proper procedure in dispatching the goods from their factory at Serinarasanna Palem after payment of duty and, therefore, rejected their refund claims. He has also held that the appellants are not entitled for Cenvat credit as Notification No. 09/2001-C.E. (N.T.), dated 1-3-2001 cannot be given retrospective effect. The appellants were not successful in their appeal b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....prescribed under Rule 173L. 5. The learned JDR maintained that the appellants had not followed the proper procedure in claiming refund under Rule 173L and, therefore, the appeals are liable to be rejected. 6. We have gone through the records carefully. The Commissioner (Appeals), in Para 8 of his order, has stated that the impugned goods have suffered duty twice. He maintains that ther....