Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2005 (2) TMI 631

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dent. [Order per : P.S. Bajaj, Member (J)]. -  This appeal has been preferred by the appellants against the impugned order dated 28-6-2004 vide which the Commissioner has confirmed the duty along with interest and also imposed penalty on them as detailed therein. 2. The learned Counsel has contended that the impugned order is liable to be set aside on the short ground that it has been....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h anti-dumping duty was payable and the same was confirmed against them. They accordingly paid the duty and also 25% of the penalty imposed within one month from the order of adjudicating authority. 5. It is also evident from the record that the appellants, feeling aggrieved, by that order of the competent authority (Commissioner of Customs) challenged the same before the Tribunal by contend....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....higher anti-dumping duty which was reduced subsequently, (ii) that for the purpose of calculating CVD, anti-dumping duty could not be included in the assessable value, (iii) the value enhancement was erroneous as the department enhanced the assessable value of the goods treating the same as of Taiwan origin whereas the goods had been found to be of Thailand origin. The Tribunal remanded the matter....