Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2004 (11) TMI 384

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Caustic Soda, Nitric Acid L.D.O. etc. on the basis of quantities shown in the Central Excise invoices under which they were received in his factory even though it was evident that the full quantity shown in the invoices was not received in the factory. The appellant in his statutory records showed the quantity as indicated in the invoices though in the private records he indicated the correct quantity received. Further it appears the appellant was claiming compensation of amounts on the short received goods from the suppliers of the inputs. The Modvat credit taken on the short received goods was worked out to be Rs. 9,48,379.54. In the impugned order the Commissioner (Appeals) confirmed the demand for this amount along with a penalty of e....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) E.L.T. 101 (Tribunal)] which is applicable to the facts of this case and that for the purpose of availing credit are Central Excise invoices and these invoices documents and these documents clearly show the amount of duty paid on the inputs. 5. The ld. SDR submitted that the private records maintained by the appellant clearly show the quantity received; that an assessee is entitled to take credit only when the inputs are received in the factory; that the appellant in the present case was claiming reimbursement from the supplier on the short received goods; that the case law cited by the appellant is only in respect of minor variation whereas in the present cases the variation is large and the Modvat credit on the short received good....