Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (10) TMI 437

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the Appellant. Shri R.K. Pardesi, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - The Miscellaneous Application is for rectification of the mistakes in Order No. C-II/2905/WZB/03 dated 12-11-2003 [2004 (163) E.L.T. 326 (T)] by which the appeal was rejected but the penalty was brought down from Rs. 50.00 lakhs to Rs. 35.00 lakhs. 2.  Arguing on the application ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 52 (Del.)] that it is only patent and obvious mistake whose discovery is not dependent on argument or elaboration, which can be rectified under the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962. It is only the amendment of the order which is permissible and no new order can be substituted in place of the earlier one. To the same effect is the Larger Bench of the Tribunal's decision in the case of Dinkar Kh....