Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2004 (7) TMI 538

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dan, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - The appellant's appeal is directed against the order-in-appeal whereby the claim for Modvat credit of Rs. 1,47,356/- was dis-allowed. Out of the said claim, an amount of Rs. 42,335/- was rejected on the ground that the credit has been taken in the month of July, 1994 on the basis of gate passes issued in September and November, 1993 by which time, the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the case of Hindustan Lever v. Collector reported 1997 (18) RLT 598 (CEGAT). In this connection I note that, so far as the first judgment is concerned, it is not forthcoming as to whether the subsidiary certificate relates to the gate passes issued after 1-4-1994. The second judgment relates to taking of credit after rescinding of Notification No. 201/79-C.E. The issue being different I hold that....